My love is your love (and when the Government says ‘No’)

Equal Love Equal Rights This is my friend Caroline.

Everyone should be so lucky to have a friend like Caroline. She’s fiercely loyal, protective, and just the right amount of crazy. You know with Caroline that if someone hurt you, she would turn up in her pick-up with a shotgun and wait with it fully loaded until you were safely in her arms.

Yeah, she’s that kind of friend. No matter where I am in the world, this woman has my back.

Caroline is getting married in a few weeks. I’d love to go and share the love, but the wedding is taking place in Canada – that’s just a little too far for a long weekend. Caroline isn’t Canadian however, nor does she reside in Canada. She is getting married there because she can’t get married in her home state of Alabama. Come to think, she couldn’t get married here in Australia either, or in my home country of New Zealand. Even as a citizen she couldn’t get married in these countries, because the love of her life, the person who loves my fiercely loyal, protective, and just the right amount of crazy friend the most also happens to be a woman.

They’ve been together 6 years and they’re mad-hippy-dippy in love, these two. That’s the way Caroline does it after-all. I don’t know how her Canadian marriage will be recognised in her own country, but I do know it won’t be recognised here. The Australian Government not only prohibits same-sex marriage, it will not recognise a same-sex marital status conferred by another country. Get married in Canada, take your honeymoon in Australia and somewhere over the Pacific you become what? Travel buddies? Where exactly does the legal status of your relationship change? I’m trying to think of an analogous example for legally married heterosexuals – meet my wife here, here and here, but over there we’re just really good friends!?  

If marriage is the single biggest symbolic and legal commitment two consenting adults can make to each other, how can democratic Governments decide so arbitrarily just when and where it will be recognised?

And it is arbitrary. Marriage segregation exists in the realm of personal whim and prejudice (thank you Collins English Dictionary for backing my word on this one). Consensual love and commitment tend not to threaten the downfall of society when straight couples are doing it, after-all. In the interests of avoiding personal whim or prejudice, I’ve thought long and hard about equal rights, and the dangers of dispensing them to some, not all. It seems to me that when a Government denies a portion of the population access to the rights others freely access, it is perhaps sheer luck that you fall on the ‘right’ side of the law this time around. Because codifying segregation is never limited to the issue at hand. It suggests a society where any ‘other’ can be ostracised should the so-called majority be inclined, whether the lines are drawn through religion, race, gender, or sexual orientation.

It is no surprise to me that the Conservative Right feel just as strongly about women’s reproductive choices as they do about the sanctity of marriage. Take a look at the series of laws – or as I prefer to call it, the epidemic of insanity – sweeping the US at present.  For every North Carolina banning same sex marriage, there is an Arizona blocking funds to Planned Parenthood, and a Virginia trying to mandate invasive internal ultrasounds before an abortion can be discouraged performed.

But back to arbitrary. I don’t mean to suggest that those who hold an opposing view to gay marriage based on their religious teachings are acting on personal whim. Well actually, I don’t mean to suggest religious faith is a personal whim, but perhaps I do consider the use of biblical text to justify upholding marriage discrimination pretty close. I don’t see the same vigilance when it comes to mixing cotton and wool, or banning people with glasses from taking communion. And luckily no-one in my workplace is allowed to stone me to death for blasphemy (though I often receive a forceful frown).  If anything the law protects me against anyone using Leviticus to sanction my behaviour.

This one isn’t about God, people. No-one will be forced to change their personal experience of same-sex relationships. And if recent surveys are anything to go by, most Australians who support same-sex marriage also support the right of a Church or religious institution to refuse to perform same-sex wedding ceremonies. Ceremonies. That’s okay! I’m not going to fight gay battles with God. Just with the Government. Technically I’m not allowed to get married in a Catholic church either and this suggests no threat to my rights before the law.

Because I am allowed to get married. I don’t have to go to another country to have a commitment to my spouse both realised and recognised (and I don’t forfeit that recognition just by taking a plane ride to another city). I don’t have to default to a ‘separate but equal’ civil union (no offence to those who choose this option, I merely dislike it as the only option).  I don’t have to fight the Government to have my consenting adult relationship/leap of faith considered just as legally and socially worthy as that of any other couple featured in the announcements section of the Saturday paper.

Alright, so I’m not actually in a relationship at the moment, let alone close to getting married, but I’m just saying if I were … well luckily for me, the law says yes. See, I may not have a pick-up (or a shotgun) but I’ve got words and a platform, and I’m calling it here. If you are married, or hope to be, think of all that it means to you and yours. Then close your eyes for a moment and imagine your Government says “No”.

Caroline honey, I’ve got your back over here on this side of the world.

Here’s to the bride and bride!

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “My love is your love (and when the Government says ‘No’)

  1. “If marriage is the single biggest symbolic and legal commitment two consenting adults can make to each other, how can democratic Governments decide so arbitrarily just when and where it will be recognised?” That is an excellent point.

    I live one state over from Alabama – it’s a tough state to be a homosexual in…

    1. Thanks muchly for your comment (great name by the way!),

      I have such romantic notions of the South and its landscape, I really can’t wait to visit. But the politics …ahhhh. Although on this issue my little Liberal nation is not doing so much better …

  2. North Carolina just banned gay marriage and any other form of domestic partnership this week. It was even sadder because it was a vote by the people. In a world already full of hate and prejudice…we should be promoting love…regardless of the genders!

    1. NC is looking crazy. I think this is about people feeling left behind by the 21st century, and this is one of the few things they can control. You’re right, though; it’s cruel and hateful.

      1. I know…I live in NC…and blogged AGAINST amendment 1. Unfortunately there was too much false advertising out there and voters failed to do their own research. This will affect more than the right to marry for gays but also the rights of unmarried same-sex couples, but by the time the consequences come to light, it will be too late.

      2. I think there is truth in that – the idea of people trying to control the last of what they recognise. It just takes such effort to be so angry and/or fearful, and to hold on so tightly. You wonder if they ever realise that?

        Anyway, thanks for reading this one – it was different from my usual stuff but just as much from my heart 😉

    2. Change will come (it always does) – we just have to keep speaking up and speaking out – and voting, especially in November – well you do, ha! I can only lobby for other people’s votes from over here 😉 x

  3. This seems like health care to me; I’m lucky to have a job that just gives me health insurance; it was kind of hard to enjoy it though, when there are lots of hard-working people (I’m talking about the U.S.) who just had no way to pay for their kids’ medical treatment until the ACA passed in 2009, which the repubs are wanting to repeal. Same with this marriage business, which seems to going the wrong way here. How can you look at a loving couple and just say, “Tough luck, you two; try Canada.”

  4. Caroline & Cash are two of the finest humans I know & although I’m hopelessly hetero, I look to their relationship as a prime example of what a loving partnership should be. Whether they have that piece of paper, or not, their’s is one of the most real commitments I can think of. I wish they could at least get the rights afforded to so many other couples, most of whom will undoubtedly end in divorce or infidelity. I am a resident of NC & had I not been romping in the woods with Caroline & a whole bunch of lesbians last week, I would have made it one vote closer to legal same sex marriage. I’m pretty disgusted by the whole fiasco, but I know we are on our way to awareness, even if it is slow going. Thank you so much for being a great friend to my great friend & sharing your thoughts from your neck o’the woods. Peace, love & all that jazz!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s